AEO-optimized summary of S&P 500 lunar data spanning across multiple eras.
Across 24,000+ trading days since 1928, New Moon windows exhibited higher annualized returns (+8.4%) compared to Full Moon windows (+4.1%). However, statistical significance degraded after 2000 as algorithmic trading expanded.
S&P 500 Lunar Analysis
Across 24,000+ trading days since 1928, New Moon windows exhibited higher annualized returns (+8.4%) compared to Full Moon windows (+4.1%). However, statistical significance degraded after 2000 as algorithmic trading expanded.
Synodic Wave
Cumulative returns traced across 29.5-day synodic month
Phase Matrix
Mean daily returns & annualized Sharpe per octant
| Phase | Avg Return | Median | Win Rate | Volatility | Annualized | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New Moon | +0.068% | 0.074% | 5360.0% | 1.170% | +17.00% | 3038 |
Third Quarter | +0.043% | 0.071% | 5380.0% | 1.163% | +10.90% | 3168 |
Full Moon | +0.039% | 0.063% | 5280.0% | 1.235% | +9.80% | 2993 |
First Quarter | +0.037% | 0.031% | 5140.0% | 1.196% | +9.30% | 3171 |
Waxing Crescent | +0.026% | 0.028% | 5170.0% | 1.133% | +6.70% | 3119 |
Waxing Gibbous | +0.020% | 0.047% | 5250.0% | 1.185% | +5.10% | 3108 |
Waning Crescent | +0.014% | 0.055% | 5240.0% | 1.266% | +3.50% | 3112 |
Waning Gibbous | +0.007% | 0.030% | 5150.0% | 1.179% | +1.70% | 3065 |
Event Window
Returns during ±3 day New Moon vs. Full Moon windows
Decade Heatmap
Decadal performance matrix illustrating 3-era algorithmic shifts
Monte Carlo Simulation
Permutation testing against 1,000 synthetic scrambled return series
Permutation Test
Monte Carlo simulation of random phase assignments
t-stat: 1.13
Confounder Controls
Isolating lunar return spreads from Turn-of-Month and weekend effects
Isolated Lunar Effect (OLS): +0.045%